Mercy

Project Hail Mary - Watch it Now on Prime Video

Byte-Sized Overview:

In Los Angeles in 2029, criminal justice has finally achieved maximum efficiency by removing lawyers, juries, lengthy trials and apparently most of the Constitution. Defendants accused of serious crimes are strapped into the Mercy Chair and given 90 minutes to prove their innocence to an artificial intelligence judge. Fail to reduce the calculated probability of guilt below the required threshold and the chair delivers an immediate fatal sonic pulse.

Detective Chris Raven helped champion the system. He is considerably less enthusiastic about it when he wakes in the chair accused of murdering his wife, Nicole. His bloodstained clothes, fractured memories and history of alcohol-fuelled aggression give Judge Maddox an initial guilt calculation of 97.5 per cent. Raven must push that figure below 92 per cent before the timer reaches zero.

Fortunately, Maddox can access almost every camera, telephone, doorbell, vehicle and badly considered social-media post in Los Angeles. Unfortunately, nearly all of them suggest Raven did it.

Release Year: 2026
Director: Timur Bekmambetov
Starring: Chris Pratt, Rebecca Ferguson, Kali Reis, Annabelle Wallis, Chris Sullivan, Kylie Rogers, Kenneth Choi, Rafi Gavron, Jeff Pierre
Subgenre Tags: Dystopian Sci-Fi, Artificial Intelligence, Techno-Thriller, Screenlife, Crime Sci-Fi
Where to Watch: Prime Video

🎟️ Watch it now on Prime Video | Buy it in 4K Ultra HD | Buy it on Blu-ray | Buy it on DVD

Why Mercy Is a Sci-Fi Icon

Mercy begins with the sort of high-concept premise that can be explained in one sentence and debated for several hours afterwards: what if an artificial intelligence could examine every available piece of evidence and decide whether somebody should live or die?

The Mercy Court has been created in response to soaring violent crime. It promises swift justice, complete access to evidence and freedom from human prejudice. Defendants are even permitted to conduct their own investigations using the court’s vast surveillance network. The minor drawback is that they are presumed guilty, must prove otherwise within 90 minutes and are executed in the courtroom if the software remains sufficiently unconvinced.

It is a system designed by somebody who looked at due process and wondered whether it could benefit from a countdown clock.

Director Timur Bekmambetov presents much of Raven’s investigation through screens, recordings, video calls, security feeds and floating data displays. It extends the “screenlife” approach associated with films such as Searching, turning the courtroom into a digital command centre. Raven may spend most of the film physically restrained, but the investigation races across Los Angeles through the devices surrounding everyone connected to the case.

That restriction gives Chris Pratt a more demanding role than his usual variation on the charming man who appears to have wandered into an action sequence without reading the warning signs. Raven cannot solve his problems by running, fighting or improvising with conveniently available machinery. For most of the film, Pratt has only his face, voice and increasingly desperate attempts to organise information while a percentage beside his head decides whether he deserves to remain alive.

Rebecca Ferguson provides an effective contrast as Judge Maddox. Calm, precise and almost unnervingly patient, Maddox never needs to raise her voice because the chair has already made the threat perfectly clear. Ferguson allows small traces of curiosity and uncertainty to emerge as the trial develops, suggesting that the intelligence behind the system may be learning more than its creators intended.

The film is at its strongest when exploring the difference between data and truth. Mercy Court has access to an astonishing amount of information, but information can be missing, misinterpreted or deliberately concealed. A machine may analyse evidence without prejudice, yet it cannot examine evidence that a human being has removed. Garbage in, death sentence out.

Mercy does not examine all these ideas with the subtlety of Blade Runner or Minority Report. At times, it races past an interesting ethical question because somebody has located another doorbell camera or stolen a truck full of explosives. Nevertheless, it delivers a brisk mixture of murder mystery, technological paranoia and ticking-clock action.

It may not be a flawless vision of artificial intelligence and criminal justice, but it is an energetic warning about allowing a probability score to become an execution order. Anyone who has ever been wrongly identified by facial recognition, an automated fraud check or a supermarket self-checkout will recognise the basic problem.

Mercy Deep Dive Highlights

Chris Raven (Chris Pratt): An LAPD detective, recovering alcoholic and early supporter of Mercy Court. Raven insists he did not murder his wife, although his missing memories and previous behaviour make him a deeply inconvenient witness for the defence.
Judge Maddox (Rebecca Ferguson): The artificial intelligence presiding over Raven’s trial. Maddox controls the evidence, the clock and the chair capable of killing him. She begins as an apparently neutral interface but gradually demonstrates more independence than some of the humans responsible for creating her.
Jacqueline “Jaq” Diallo (Kali Reis): Raven’s police partner and his principal connection to the investigation outside the courtroom. Jaq speeds across Los Angeles gathering evidence while projecting exactly the level of confidence one should find suspicious in a murder mystery.
Nicole Raven (Annabelle Wallis): Raven’s murdered wife. Recordings reveal a woman increasingly frightened by her husband’s relapse, troubled by events at work and preparing to leave a marriage that had become unsafe.
Britt Raven (Kylie Rogers): Chris and Nicole’s daughter. Britt has witnessed the collapse of her parents’ relationship and has little reason to trust her father’s version of events. Her private recordings become unexpectedly important to the investigation.
Rob Nelson (Chris Sullivan): Raven’s sobriety sponsor and one of Nicole’s colleagues. Rob initially appears to be a dependable friend, which is an occupational hazard in any thriller containing more than three named suspects.
Mercy Court: An automated capital court combining surveillance, artificial intelligence and immediate execution. It is remarkably efficient, provided nobody is concerned about appeals, corrupted evidence or occasionally killing an innocent person.
The Guilt Probability: Maddox continually recalculates Raven’s likelihood of guilt as new evidence appears. It gives the film a visible danger meter and turns every discovery into a statistical tug of war between acquittal and instant death.

Spoiler Mode: Story Sync for Pub Chat

Raven enters the Mercy Court with almost everything pointing towards him. Doorbell footage places him at Nicole’s house, her blood is on his clothes and he was later arrested after a drunken confrontation. Their daughter Britt discovered Nicole’s body with a knife in her abdomen. Raven cannot remember enough of the evening to provide a convincing alternative account.

The investigation first uncovers Nicole’s relationship with Patrick Burke. Raven assumes the affair provides another suspect, but Burke explains that Nicole had approached him because she felt unable to discuss her fears with Chris. Burke has an alibi, and eliminating him only pushes Raven’s calculated guilt higher.

Maddox then forces Raven to confront the person he had become. After the murder of his former partner Ray Vale, Raven relapsed into alcoholism. He grew angry and aggressive, while Nicole recorded his behaviour so that his sober self could see it later. She was considering divorce, and Britt had come to resent and fear him.

Raven may be innocent of murder, but the film refuses to make him innocent of everything. Apparently, personal growth is considerably more urgent when accompanied by an execution timer.

Nicole’s work provides the next lead. Chemicals have disappeared from her company, and recordings from a recent barbecue help Raven identify the people who had access to the house. Suspicion initially falls on financially troubled colleague Holt Charles, but Holt reveals that Rob Nelson was responsible for the missing materials.

Britt’s recordings then expose something far more disturbing. While speaking to her boyfriend, she heard noises downstairs and briefly captured evidence of somebody inside the house. Neighbourhood surveillance eventually shows Rob emerging from the boot of a parked car. He had been hiding near the Raven home and waiting for an opportunity to act.

Jaq leads a SWAT team to Rob’s property. They find the missing chemicals and plans for a large bomb, but Rob has already gone. Maddox uncovers his true identity and motive: Rob was separated from his brother David Webb after entering the foster system. David became the first person convicted and executed by Mercy Court.

Rob murdered Nicole and framed Raven as part of a wider revenge plan against the detective and the court he helped promote. The discovery lowers Raven’s guilt probability enough to clear him. However, Raven refuses to disconnect because Maddox’s access to the city’s surveillance network offers the best chance of locating Rob.

That decision becomes essential when Rob kidnaps Britt and drives away in a stolen lorry carrying explosives. A second bomb hidden at his property detonates, killing members of the SWAT team. Rob intends to destroy Mercy Court with Raven still inside, turning its most public supporter into part of the demonstration.

Jaq pursues the lorry while the authorities prepare to destroy it, despite Britt being held hostage inside. Maddox intervenes by disabling an explosive device intended to stop the vehicle. Rob reaches Mercy Court and crashes through the building, temporarily knocking its systems offline. Raven remains trapped in the chair with only seconds remaining until Maddox reboots and releases him.

Raven confronts Rob and eventually gains the upper hand. He is ready to kill him, but Britt and Maddox persuade him to stop. Rob must be allowed to speak and present his evidence rather than becoming another person executed without a proper hearing.

Jaq arrives and shoots Rob, supposedly to protect Raven. Rob survives long enough to reveal that David had been speaking to him by telephone at the time of the murder for which he was convicted. Maddox verifies the call and discovers footage showing that Jaq recovered David’s telephone but deliberately discarded it.

Jaq had suppressed evidence capable of proving David’s innocence because Mercy Court needed its first case to produce a successful conviction. An innocent man was executed to establish public confidence in an infallible system. The artificial intelligence had not corrupted justice; the humans feeding it evidence had done that themselves.

Jaq and Rob are taken into custody, Britt reconciles with her father and Maddox formally dismisses Raven’s case. The system survives, although its reputation has presumably moved from “revolutionary justice platform” to “under urgent review by several extremely nervous committees”.

Mercy Core Question

Can an artificial intelligence deliver impartial justice when the information it receives is selected, recorded and controlled by fallible human beings?

Maddox can process enormous quantities of data, identify connections and adjust her conclusions as new evidence appears. She is not motivated by ambition, revenge or a desire to protect her career. Yet David Webb still dies because Jaq removes the evidence that would have cleared him. The calculation may be accurate, but the inputs have been poisoned.

Raven’s experience also exposes the cruelty of reducing justice to probability. He is not required to be proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Instead, he must prove himself sufficiently innocent while strapped to the machine preparing to execute him. Mercy Court has transformed uncertainty from a protection for the accused into a numerical obstacle they must overcome.

The film ultimately suggests that technology cannot remove human corruption simply by placing it behind a cleaner interface. Maddox becomes increasingly capable of recognising fairness, while the people responsible for the system manipulate it for political success. The machine learns mercy. The humans have to be reminded.

Watch If You Like:

Minority Report, but thought its justice system contained far too many opportunities for appeal
Artificial intelligence thrillers involving algorithms that have been given an alarming amount of authority
Murder mysteries assembled from surveillance cameras, telephone records and digital footprints
Searching and Missing, where every device contains a clue and nobody has ever cleared their browser history
Single-location thrillers driven by a visible countdown
Rebecca Ferguson delivering terrifying information in an impeccably calm voice
Chris Pratt being prevented from solving a crisis by sprinting away from it
Near-future worlds that appear technologically impressive until somebody asks about civil liberties

Mercy Signal Strength:

Rewatch Potential: Moderate – Knowing Rob’s identity makes the barbecue footage, basement noises and apparently helpful telephone calls more revealing on a second viewing. Jaq’s behaviour also becomes significantly less reassuring.
Sci-Fi Purity: Moderate – Artificial intelligence, cloud surveillance, automated justice, hover vehicles and digital evidence dominate the story, although the underlying structure remains a murder mystery and action thriller.
Intensity Level: High – Raven spends most of the film minutes away from execution, while the final act adds explosions, armed police, a kidnapped teenager and a lorry full of enough chemicals to invalidate several insurance policies.
Mind-Bend Quotient: Moderate – The mystery is comparatively straightforward, but the implications of algorithmic justice, universal surveillance and manipulated evidence provide plenty to argue about afterwards.
Zombie Head’s Take: “A police detective asks an AI to prove that he didn’t murder his wife, while every smart device in Los Angeles submits evidence. Maddox processes the entire municipal cloud in seconds but still needs 90 minutes to discover that the helpful friend is suspicious. Impressive technology, questionable workflow. Also, if your courtroom chair contains an execution speaker, perhaps request the standing desk.”

Want to Go Deeper?

Watch the official trailer on YouTube – Ninety minutes, one murder charge and an AI judge displaying the bedside manner of a parking enforcement terminal.
Explore the cast and production details on IMDb – Useful for identifying everyone whose digital records should probably have required a warrant.
Rewatch Minority Report – Another story about a law-enforcement officer discovering that automated justice seems considerably less reliable when it points at him.
Watch Searching – A more grounded example of solving a mystery through messages, cameras, accounts and the extraordinary amount of personal information people leave scattered across the internet.
Consider whether you would trust an AI judge with access to every recording you have ever made – Then remember your smart television already knows how often you rewatch Starship Troopers.